Quick. I say “mass media campaign” and you name the “media” that come to mind: _____.
Not so long ago, you would likely have answered “TV and radio.” With “new media” abounding, broadcast TV and radio are now relegated to “traditional media.” But what about when technology—even electricity—lags. What does “mass media” mean then?
I wasn’t joking when I told Mary Penny and Hilary Creed-Kanashiro that the Skype call we had recently fulfilled a fantasy for me. For some time, I’ve been fascinated with a study they and their Peruvian colleagues were part of about 10 years ago. And now I’d been granted my wish to ask my questions. Continue reading
Whether he’s aware of his influence or not, almost every father in every culture influences his family’s choices about how to feed the children. His everyday decisions about how many of the eggs the family’s chickens lay will be sold at market and how many will be kept at home for the family to eat can make the difference between a stunted child and one who reaches his or her full growth potential.
An article in a recent issue of The New Yorker magazine sped throughout our organization, FHI 360. The surgeon and writer Atul Gawande wrote “Slow Ideas: Some innovations spread fast. How do you speed the ones that don’t?” The e-mail traffic about this article made me curious about why the article itself was spreading so fast.
I love a tightly designed mass media product. It shows a discipline I admire. And I am also a true believer in the power of interpersonal and community communication.
In Viet Nam, Alive & Thrive could reach hundreds of thousands of people with interpersonal communication – but to reach millions, our country team determined that we needed mass media, primarily TV. Continue reading
The U.S. news was abuzz last week about a new study showing that 40 percent of American mothers feed their babies solid foods way too early.
Whose fault is that?
Over half of those moms said their doctor had told them to. Continue reading
As the U.S. turns to President Obama’s inauguration, we at Alive & Thrive reflect on what re-electing a U.S. president and promoting a health behavior may have in common:
Being precise about which behavior you need to promote
Obama’s door-to-door canvassing effort was clear in its behavioral objective. Rather than knocking all doors to persuade undecided voters to support Obama, volunteer canvassers were directed, through a carefully constructed database, to the homes of people who had already indicated they were pro-Obama. The behavioral objective was to make sure those likely Democrat voters would “go to the polls and vote.” Continue reading